This single paragraph order tracks the reference proceedings in LAR No. 102 of 2007 and First Appeal No. 1032 of 2009. The court declares the instant civil application disposed of and orders its hearing with the other mentioned appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 CA No.6478 of 2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
Civil Application No.6478 of 2011 In First Appeal No.1069 of 2011
Najmunbee w/o Badesaheb Sayyad. .. Applicant.
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Others. .. Respondents.
Shri. P.V. Mandlik, Senior Counsel, i/by Shri. Amol S. Gandhi, Advocate for applicant.
Shri. V.B. Ghatge, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent Nos. 1 and 2.
Shri. C.R. Deshpande, Advocate, for respondent Nos.3,4 and 5.
CORAM: NARESH H PATIL & M.T. JOSHI, JJ.
DATE 5th DECEMBER 2011
PER COURT :
Counsel. It is submitted that respondent Nos.1 and 2 be restrained from withdrawing the amount of compensation granted by the Reference Court in LAR No.102 of 2007.
2 CA No.6478 of 2011
Sd/- Sd/- (M.T. JOSHI, J.) (NARESH H PATIL, J.)
rsl
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to dispose of the pending civil application while it is linked with another first appeal before the same bench.
Whether the First Appeal No. 1032 of 2009 regarding MIDC Latur should be heard together with First Appeal No. 1069 of 2011.
Najmunbee w/o Badesaheb Sayyad
The State of Maharashtra
NARESH H PATIL
M.T. JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
