The Bombay High Court permitted the correction of a typographical error in Company Application 575 of 2010, finding no prejudice would result, and made the application absolute based on the prayer clauses.
Application made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b) to correct typographical error.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
ca.575.10.csp.559.10.csd.606.10.68
kps
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
COMPANY APPLICATION NO.575 OF 2010 IN COMPANY SCHEME PETITION NO.559 OF 2010 IN
COMPANY SUMMONS FOR DIRECTION NO.606 OF 2010
Fundermax India Pvt.Ltd..
..Applicant/original Petitioner
Ms.Revati Mankar, for the Applicant. Mr.C.J.Joy, for the Joint Regional Director.
CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 05th January, 2011.
P.C.
1 Heard the learned counsel appearing for the Applicant in support and the learned counsel appearing for the Registrar of Companies. 2 Having perused the application and the affidavit in support, I am satisfied that no prejudice will be caused if typographical error is permitted to be corrected.
3 In these circumstances, the application is made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b).
(S.C. Dharmadhikari, J)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a typographical error in the application warrants permission to correct without causing prejudice.
Fundermax India Pvt.Ltd.
Joint Regional Director
SC Dharmadhikari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
