The High Court of Judicature at Bombay disposed of three criminal revision applications filed by Pramod Shrivastav as withdrawn, permitting the filing of fresh applications if permissible.
Applications disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
SNS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MUMBAI APPELLATE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.77 OF 2011 IN
CRI. REVISION APPLICATION NO.292 OF 2010
Pramod Shrivastav ...Applicant. v/s. Smt. Nirupa R. Iyer & Anr. ...Respondents.
WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.78 OF 2011 IN
CRI. REVISION APPLICATION NO.293 OF 2010
Pramod Shrivastav ...Applicant v/s. State & Anr. ...Respondents.
WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.79 OF 2011 IN
CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.294 OF 2010
Pramod Shrivastav ...Applicant v/s. State and Anr. ....Respondents.
Mr. Aniket Vagal, adv. For the Applicant. Smt. V.R.Bhosale, APP For the Respondent No.2. Smt. M.R.Tidke, APP for the R.No.2 (in APPR No.78/2011) Shri Rajesh More, APP for the R.No.2 (in APPR No.79/2011)
CORAM : J.H. BHATIA, J. DATED : MARCH 10, 2011.
P.C.
1 The learned counsel for the applicant seeks to withdraw these applications in view of the fact that earlier revision applications
filed by the applicant were also withdrawn.
However, the applicant shall be at liberty to file fresh applications if permissible under the law.
(J.H. BHATIA,J.)
Pramod Shrivastav
Smt. Nirupa R. Iyer & Anr
State & Anr
J.H. BHATIA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
