A single-paragraph order allowing Criminal Appeal Stamp No. 26 of 2011 based on prayer clause B and disposing of the application. No detailed reasoning or facts provided.
Application allowed in terms of prayer clause B and disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 cri appln 337.11
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 337 OF 2011 IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL STAMP NO. 26 OF 2011
Meerabhai Hussain Pathan and others .. Applicants
Versus
The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent
Shri K. B. Autade, Advocate for Applicants. Shri S. G. Nandedkar, A.P.P. for the Respondent/State.
CORAM : S. S. SHINDE, J.
DATE : 27TH JANUARY, 2011.
PER COURT :
. Heard learned counsel appearing for applicants and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent/State. Perused the contents of the application. The application is allowed in terms of prayer clause “B” and stands disposed of.
[S. S. SHINDE, J.]
bsb/Jan. 11
Meerabhai Hussain Pathan and others
The State of Maharashtra
S. S. SHINDE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
