Dismissed
The State of Maharashtra v. Bhimrao Rupchand Nath
Bombay HCAPPLN/942/2010
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
cran942.10
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 942 OF 2010
The State of Maharashtra ...Applicant Versus Bhimrao Roopchand Nath ...Respondent
Mr. V.G. Shelke, A.P.P. for the applicant
Mr. B.R. Kedar, advocate for the respondent-sole.
CORAM: S. S. SHINDE, J. DATED: 25th JANUARY, 2011
PER COURT:-
1 Heard. Upon perusal of papers made available, it appears that
the basic case of the prosecution is that the accused respondent herein demanded Rs.2000/-, Rs.500/-, and Rs.10,000/- for not arresting the daughter of the complainant viz. Sunanda. Learned Judge after taking into consideration the evidence brought on record by the prosecution in para 37, held that on the day of meeting of the accused with PW 1 Jayawantabai no any crime/offence was registered against Sunanda. Therefore, there was no question of arresting
cran942.10
Sunanda by the concerned police Officer. It appears from the discussion in the impugned judgment that since the case was handled by the concerned Officer against husband of Sunanda the complainant has some grudge against the respondent Officer. When there is no offence registered against Sunanda, there was no question of arresting or releasing her.
( S. S. SHINDE. J.)
rlj/
The State of Maharashtra
Bhimrao Roopchand Nath
S. S. Shinde
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court