Sushant Ashruba Solunke and Ors. v. the State of Mah and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court confirmed anticipatory bail granted to applicants apprehending arrest under criminal charges including offences under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, while imposing strict conditions.
What did the court decide?
The applicants' anticipatory bail is confirmed on condition that they shall not influence witnesses or tamper with prosecution evidence, directly or indirectly.
What the court decided
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
Office Notes,Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders.
Court's or Judge's orders
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2985 OF 2011
SUSHANT ASHRUBA SOLUNKE AND ORS VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAH AND ANR
Mr. Mukhedkar Amit A. Adv. for applicants. Mr. G.R.Ingole APP for respondents.
With APPLN/3059/2011 ,
Mr. S.S.Rathi advocate for applicant. Mr. G.R.Ingole APP for respondents.
With APPLN/3083/2011 ,
Mr. Mukhedkar Amit A. Adv. for applicants. Mr. G.R.Ingole APP for respondents.
With APPLN/3098/2011
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail preference by the applicants should be confirmed in light of the completed investigation and failure in Test Identification Parade.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Sushant Ashruba Solunke and Ors.
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Coram
SHRIHARI P. DAVARE
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court