Single judge dismissed the criminal application holding that no further interference was required as the Division Bench had already addressed an identical prayer in a writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPLN 290.11.sxw
1
JPP
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.290 OF 2011
Mr. Sachin Hanumant Nagne.
... Applicant.
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra.
... Respondent.
Ms. B.P. Jakhade for the Applicant. Mr. S.S. Pednekar, APP for the State.
CORAM : K.U. CHANDIWAL, J.
DATED : 28th SEPTEMBER 2011.
P.C. :-
Heard.
(K.U. CHANDIWAL,J.)
2 APPLN 290.11.sxw
Applicant
The State of Maharashtra
K.U. Chandiwал
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
