Disposed
Rahul Anna Jadhav v. the State of Mah
Bombay HCAPPLN/16/2011
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
1. FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.16/2011. (Rahul s/o Anna Jadhav Vs. State of Maharashtra)
Office notes, office Memoranda of
Coram,appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders
Court’s or Judge’s orders.
Mrs.Sadhana S Jadhav, Adv. for applicant; Mr.VH Dighe, APP for State.
CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL,J.
DATE :19th January, 2011.
1) Heard.
2) The counsel submits that the trial is
commenced and therefore she does not
press for the application.
3) The application is disposed of as not
pressed.
(K.U.CHANDIWAL)
JUDGE
bdv/
Rahul s/o Anna Jadhav
State of Maharashtra
K.U.CHANDIWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court