The High Court treated the criminal application as infructuous and disposed of it because papers were not traceable and the underlying writ petition was already disposed of.
Application treated as infructuous and disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
PPD
1
5.appw.109-97
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.109 OF 1997 IN
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.934 OF 1996
KARTIK @ KIRTI GOVARDHAN ..Applicant. Versus
R.D.TYAGI & ORS.
..Respondents.
Mr.Arfan Sait, Advocate i/b. Mr.N.N. Gavankar, Advocate for the Applicant.
Mr.J.P. Yagnik, A.P.P. for the State.
CORAM : A.M. KHANWILKAR AND
A.R. JOSHI, JJ.
DATED : 27th JANUARY, 2011.
P.C.
the applicant submits that the Writ Petition is already disposed of as a result of which this application has also become infructuous. In the circumstances, Office to treat this application is disposed of as infructuous.
(A. R. JOSHI, J.) (A. M. KHANWILKAR, J.)
KARTIK @ KIRTI GOVARDHAN
R.D.TYAGI & ORS.
A.M. KHANWILKAR
A.R. JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
