The High Court granted leave to file a criminal appeal challenging the acquittal of a tenant in a cheque bouncing case. The court dismissed the appeal, upholding the Metropolitan Magistrate's finding that no outstanding dues existed justifying the issuance of cheques.
Leave to file appeal against acquittal refused; appeal dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
appln 102 of 2011
1
vks
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 102 OF 2011
Naresh T Raisighani
.. Applicant
-versus Mr. Manish Arora and anr .. Respondents.
Mr. Prashant Badole, for the Applicant.
Ms. S. V. Gajare, APP for the Respondent State.
CORAM: R.C. CHAVAN, J. DATED: 22nd June, 2011
P.C.
2 appln 102 of 2011
outstanding towards which the applicant could present the cheques which remained with him because initial agreement was for 24 months. The view taken by the learned Magistrate is proper. Leave refused. Appeal dismissed.
(R. C. CHAVAN, J.)
2 issues framed by the court
Whether leave to file appeal against the acquittal of the respondents should be granted.
Whether the assailment of cheques presented by the landlord warrants the conviction of the tenant.
Naresh T Raisighani
Mr. Manish Arora
R.C. CHAVAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
