The Criminal Application seeking early hearing of a 2006 criminal appeal was rejected on the grounds that appeals of older categories are prioritized. The appeal will be processed according to the standard queue for convicts in jail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 appa4911
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 49 OF 2011
IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1261 OF 2006
Malik Rajjak Shekhdare ...Applicant
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent
Mr. Shekhar Ingawale for the Applicant
Mr. J.P. Yagnik, A.P.P., for the State.
CORAM: A.M. KHANWILKAR AND A.R. JOSHI, JJ. DATE: 25TH JANUARY, 2011
P.C.:-
This application is received through jail, praying for early
hearing of the pending appeal.
2 appa4911
queue in the said category of cases. Presently, appeals of 2004 are notified for final hearing.
who is in jail, for information.
A.R. JOSHI, J. A.M. KHANWILKAR, J.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant early hearing to the pending criminal appeal of the convict in jail.
Malik Rajjak Shekhdare
The State of Maharashtra
A.M. KHANWILKAR
A.R. JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
