The Bombay High Court dismissed an appeal against an order dated 82 of 2006 as infructuous, without substantive reasoning.
Was the appeal to be dismissed as infructuous?
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
274 ao.82.06
ndm
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 82 OF 2006
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders
Mr. G.R.Mishra for the Appellant.
Mrs. K.K.Soraan for the Respondent – BMC.
CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 28th March, 2011.
P.C.
The learned counsel appearing for the Appellant seeks permission to withdraw the appeal as the same has become infructuous. Dismissed as infructuous.
[ A.S.OKA, J ]
Appellant
BMC
A.S. Oka
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
