Plaintiff Bank of Baroda sought to withdraw Suit No. 28 of 2009 as settled out of Court. The Court disposed of the suit as withdrawn. Court fees were to be refunded.
Suit disposed as withdrawn; Court fees to be refunded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 s-28-09
I N THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
jmi
SUIT NO. 28 OF 2009.
Bank of Baroda. ..Plaintiff. vs. Suresh Umid Solanki & Ors. ..Defendants.
Ms. Priya Baliga, i/b. M.V. Kini & Co., for Plaintiff. None for Defendants.
CORAM : S.J. KATHAWALLA, J. DATE : 27TH JANUARY 2011.
P.C.
The learned Advocate appearing for the Plaintiff on instructions seeks to withdraw the Suit as settled out of Court. 2. The Suit is disposed of as withdrawn. Refund of Court fees as per Rules.
[ S.J. KATHAWALLA, J. ]
S.J. Kathawalla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
