Feroze Foods and Flavours v. Maruti Mohite
Case brief
What is this about?
The suit was dismissed for want of prosecution as no one appeared for the plaintiff despite it being listed for an ex-parte decree.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
45.s.592.09.sxw
skt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
SUIT NO. 592 OF 2009
M/s.Feroze Foods & Flavours ..Plaintiff
-Versus-
Maruti Mohite ..Defendant
None for the Plaintiff.
None for the Defendant.
CORAM : S.J. KATHAWALLA, J. DATE : 25TH JANUARY 2011.
P.C.
1 The suit has appeared under the caption ‘For Ex-parte Decree’. However, none appear for the plaintiff. In view thereof, the suit is dismissed for want of prosecution.
[ S.J. KATHAWALLA, J.]
S.J. KATHAWALLA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court