The High Court of Bombay at Goa dismissed the criminal writ petition as non-maintainable, holding that the petitioner should have complied with the prior order of the J.M.F.C. allowing the complainant's application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 74 OF 2009
M/S. M. C. SHAH THROUGH ATTORNEY R. I. JOSHI ... Petitioner Versus
MR. PRAKASH MODI AND ANR.,
... Respondents
Mr. J. P. Godinho, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Coram:R. M. SAVANT, J.
Date:18th January, 2010
P.C.
The Petitioner questions the Order dated 21.05.2009, passed by the learned J.M.F.C., Ponda, by which Order, the application dated 21.05.2009 filed by the Complainant came to be allowed and the complaint was returned to the Complainant for presentation to the appropriate Court.
R. M. SAVANT, J.
arp/*
M/S. M. C. SHAH THROUGH ATTORNEY R. I. JOSHI
MR. PRAKASH MODI AND ANR.
R. M. SAVANT
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
