S.M. Karandikar v. State of Maharashtra and 7 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICUATURE AT MUMBAI ORDINARY…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
hvn
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICUATURE AT MUMBAI ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL SIDE
WRIT PETITION NO. 990 OF 2009
S.M. Karandikar
.... Petitioner
Versus
State of Maharashtra
... Respondents
Mr. R.V. Govilkar and Ms. Anita Rai i/hy Mayur Narenedra & Co. for Petitioner.
Mrs. Anjali Helekar, A.G.P. For R. Nos. 1 and 2.
Mr. Sheeraz Rustomjee i/by Leena Adhvaryu for the Applicant/Intervener.
Ms. Rupali Pawar i/by M/s. Law Point for R. NO. 6.
Mr. S.P. Bharti for for R. No. 9.
Mr. Roshan D’zouza i/by Mr. Umesh Shetty for R. No. 3.
CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & J.H. BHATIA, JJ. DATED : JANUARY 12, 2010
P.C.
On behalf of the State Government, communication dated 3.7.2009 is shown whereby the Petitioners were informed of rejection of the application for renewal. Copy of this communication is taken on record.
On behalf of the Petitioner the learned counsel submits that they have not received the said order. At any rate, considering the decision of the State Government, in our opinion, nothing survives in this petition. If the Petitioner is entitled to challenge the order of rejection, he may do so independently and disposal
of this petition will not stand in his way.
In the event the petitioners are entitled to challenge the floating of the tender, then dismissal of this petition will not stand in his way.
(J.H. BHATIA,J.)
(F.I. REBELLO,J.)
S.M. Karandikar
State of Maharashtra
Leena Adhvaryu
M/s. Law Point
Umrao Singh Bharti
Roshan D’zouza
F.I. REBELLO
J.H. BHATIA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court