Writ petition filed by an employee whose removal appeal was pending. Court directed the appellate authority to decide the appeal by June 30, 2011, noting no interim relief was available since the petitioner was already removed.
Directing the appellate authority to dispose of the pending appeal by June 30, 2011; rejection of interim relief prayers.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 9028 OF 2010
S. Durai
....Petitioner
vs.
Union of India & others
... Respondents
Mr. V. Mishra, instructed by M/s. V. Mishra & Co., for the petitioner. None for the respondent.
CORAM : P.B. MAJMUDAR &
MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ.
DATE: DECEMBER 16, 2010.
P.C.
The grievance of the petitioner is that the appeal which is pending before the appropriate authority is not yet decided. It is submitted that the appeal is filed against the order of the disciplinary authority removing the petitioner from the services. The leaned counsel for the petitioner submits that the appeal is filed in July, 2010.
-2-
P. B. MAJMUDAR, J.
MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a direction should be issued to the appellate authority to dispose of the pending removal appeal expeditiously despite the petitioner being already removed.
S. Durai
Union of India
P. B. MAJMUDAR
MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
