Petitioner pressed no cause in Writ Petition No.863/2010 after the Assistant Public Prosecutor stated that the preliminary enquiry revealed a civil dispute and no offence had been registered. The petition was disposed of as not pressed.
Petition disposed of as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
L
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION No.863/2010
Office Notes, OfficeCourt�s or � |
� Judge�s orders |
|---|---|
Memoranda of Coram, |
|
appearances, Court�s |
|
orders or directions and |
|
Registrar�s orders. |
Mr Subhash Jha i/by Law Global Advocates for the Petitioner.
Mrs S.D. Shinde, A.P.P.,for the State.
CORAM:- D.B. BHOSALE AND A.R. JOSHI, JJ.
DATE :- 15TH APRIL, 2010.
P.C.:-
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2.Learned A.P.P, on instructions from Mr S.L. Yadav,
P.S.I., V.P. Road Police Station, Mumbai, who is present in
the Court, submits that the police have completed the
preliminary enquiry and they have decided not to register any
offence either against the petitioner or any other person
since the preliminary enquiry discloses that nature of
dispute was civil. In view of the statement made by learned
A.P.P., learned counsel for the petitioner Mr Jha does not
press this writ petition. Petition is disposed of as not
pressed.
(A.R.JOSHI,J)
(D.B. BHOSALE,J)
L
P.C.
State
D.B. BHOSALE
A.R. JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court