In this writ petition, the Court observed that the facts and law were identical to a previously decided writ petition. Consequently, the instant petition was disposed of in the same terms as the earlier order.
Rule made absolute in the same terms as in W.P. No.6728 of 2010.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Kambli 1 wp7809.10
IN THE HIGH COURT JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.7809 OF 2010
Atharva
Dnyanprasark
Mandals...Petitioner
vs.
1.The State of Maharashtra
and others. ...Respondents
---
Mr.Sarang S.Aradhye, for Petitioner.
Mr.Girish Kulkarni, for Respondent no.3.
Mr.S.R.Nargolkar, AGP for Respondents 1 & 2
CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH &
N.D.DESHPANDE,JJ.
thOctober, 2010
P.C.:
1. Rule returnable forthwith. Heard
Kambli 2 wp7809.10
finally by consent of parties. It is common
ground that the facts and law involved in
this petition are identical to the facts and
law involved in Writ Petition No.6728 of
2010 which is decided on 1.9.2010 by
the Division Bench of this Court.
Therefore, for the reasons disclosed in the
order dated 1.9.2010 in Writ Petition no.6728
of 2010, this writ petition is disposed of in
the same terms. Rule is made absolute
accordingly.
(D.K.DESHMUKH,J.)
(N.D.DESHPANDE,J.)
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Writ Petition No.6728 of 2010Followed¶1
Atharva Dnyanprasark Mandals
The State of Maharashtra
D.K.DESHMUKH
N.D.DESHPANDE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court