The Writ Petition was dismissed as withdrawn by the learned counsel for the petitioner with no order as to costs. The writ petition accordingly stands disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 693 OF 2003
Sachin S/o Gurunath Salunke
.... PETITIONER
V E R S U S
The State of Maharashtra & Oths. .... RESPONDENTS
Mr.S.T.Veer, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. K.G.Patil, Assistant Govt. Pleader for State. Mr. C.K.Shinde, Advocate for respondent no. 7.
CORAM : P.V.HARDAS & S.V.GANGAPURWALA, JJ.
DATE : 19/04/2010
PER COURT :
[ S.V.GANGAPURWALA ] [ P.V.HARDAS ] JUDGE JUDGE
knp/ WP 693.03
2
Sachin S/o Gurunath Salunke
The State of Maharashtra
P.V.HARDAS
S.V.GANGAPURWALA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
