Application for review of a previous order of the same court was dismissed for want of prosecution, as the sole respondent had expired without his legal representatives being brought on record.
Application dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.6702 OF 2001 IN
WRIT PETITION NO.317 OF 1987
The State of Mah., through Dy. Conservator of Forest
..APPLICANT
VERSUS
Devidasrao Shankarrao Nemiwant
..RESPONDENT
Mrs A.V. Gondhalekar, A.G.P. for the applicant.
CORAM : P.V. HARDAS AND S. V. GANGAPURWALA,JJ.
DATE : 16th April, 2010
PER COURT :
This is an application at the behest of the applicant - State seeking review of the order of this Court, dated 11.10.1999. The sole respondent expired in the year 2008 and since then no steps have been taken by the applicant for bringing his legal representatives on record. In that light of the matter, therefore, we dismiss the application for want of prosecution.
(S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.)
( P.V.HARDAS, J. )
amj/ca6702.01
The State of Mah.
Devidasrao Shankarrao Nemiwant
P.V. HARDAS
S. V. GANGAPURWALA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
