High Court disposed of a writ petition by ordering the respondent to reinstate the petitioner with service continuity from 17.3.1990, clarifying entitlement to benefits.
Reinstatement with continuity of service from 17.3.1990; no back wages; promotion eligible immediately.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
Bsb
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 6461 OF 1999
Shrikant Anant Urankar ... Petitioner
v/s
Mrs.Anjali Helekar for the petitioner.
Mr.N.V.Walawalkar for respondent No.1.
CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J.
DATED: 22ND DECEMBER, 2010
P.C.:
(i) The petitioner will be entitled to reinstatement with continuity of service with effect from 17.3.1990 i.e. the date of his termination from service.
2
(ii) The petitioner will not be entitled to back wages for the period of his unemployment with the Municipal Corporation.
(iii) It is made clear that the service of the petitioner will be reckoned as continuous with effect from 17.3.1990 for the purposes of pay fixation, payment of pension, gratuity and any other retiral benefits only.
(iv) The petitioner will not be entitled to any leave wages or other consequential benefits for his period of unemployment with the Corporation except as aforesaid.
(v) The petitioner will be eligible for being considered for promotion with effect from today.
.....
3
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to reinstatement with continuity of service.
Whether the petitioner is entitled to back wages and consequential benefits for the period of unemployment.
Whether the petitioner is eligible for promotion immediately.
Shrikant Anant Urankar
Municipal Corpn. of the City of Sangli-Miraj and Kupwad
Nishita Mhatre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court