The Principal,Shri M.K.Prashala and Jr.College and Ors. Vs Rafiq Babu Mashale and Anr.

on instructions from him that he is willing to forego the backwages awarded by the School Tribunal, Pune Region, Solapur in the impugned order dated 20.1.2000 in Appeal No.105 of 1999.

¶16

On this statement being made, Mr.Deshmukh appearing for the Petitioners, on instructions from Petitioner No.1, who is present in Court, seeks leave to withdraw the petition.

¶17

Mr.Bhansode, appearing for Respondent No.3, objects to the withdrawal of

¶18

WP/676/2000

¶19

: 2 :

¶20

this petition. In my opinion, respondent No.3 has no locus to object to the withdrawal of the Petition.

¶21

The Writ Petition is accordingly allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such.

¶22

In view of the dismissal of the petition itself, Civil application No.2932 of 2010 has become infructuous and is dismissed as such.

The Principal,Shri M.K.Prashala and Jr.College and Ors. v. Rafiq Babu Mashale and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Principal,Shri M.K.Prashala and Jr.College and Ors. v. Rafiq Babu Mashale and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Kolhapur Municipal Transport Vs Tanaji Dinkar Waskar

Rajkumar Hari Gadgil and Anr. Vs Vadgaon Saraf Vyapari Nagari Sahakari Pat Sanstha Mydt. and Ors.

The Kolhapur Municipal Transport Vs Tanaji Dinkar Waskar

Pune Mahanagarpalika Kamgar Union Pune Vs Pune Mahanagarpalika, Pune and Ors.

The Principal,Shri M.K.Prashala and Jr.College and Ors. Vs Rafiq Babu Mashale and Anr.

Govind Vithal Malik Vs the General Manager, B.E.S.T.Undertaking