The High Court bench dismissed the writ petition after the petitioner withdrew it with liberty to appeal against the SDO's order. The order was disposed of without further reasoning.
Petition disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to appeal against the SDO's order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp5743.10
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 5743 OF 2010
Narayan s/o Nanhesing Girase & another
.. PETITIONERS
VERSUS
1 The District Collector & others .. RESPONDENTS
Mr. V.B. Patil, advocate for the petitioner.
Mrs. A.V. Gondhalekar, AGP for the State.
Mr. R.N. Dhorde, advocate holding for Mr. V.R. Dhorde, advocate for respondent no. 4.
=====
CORAM : B.R. GAVAI & R.M. BORDE, JJ. DATE : 14th DECEMBER, 2010.
PER COURT :
. Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks liberty to withdraw the
petition with further liberty to file an appeal challenging the order passed by
the SDO. Petition stands disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
( R. M. BORDE ) JUDGE
( B. R. GAVAI ) JUDGE
dyb
Narayan s/o Nanhesing Girase
1 The District Collector
B.R. Gavai
R.M. Borde
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
