High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench dismissed a writ petition as infructuous after the respondent established that the entire disputed amount was received by the bank, vacating any interim relief.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous; interim relief vacated; no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
Office Notes,Office Memoranda of coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders
Court's or Judge's orders
WRIT PETITION NO.5736/2006
(K.U.CHANDIWAL, J.) (S.B.DESHMUKH, J.)
Dt : 30.08.2010 aaa/5736.06
Petitioner
Bank
Respondent No.1
Respondent No.2
Respondent No.3
K.U.CHANDIWAL
S.B.DESHMUKH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
