The petition was disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to adopt appropriate remedy against respondents 4 to 7, without any opinion on merits.
Writ petition disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to adopt appropriate remedy against respondents 4 to 7.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
L
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION No.552/2010
Office Notes, Office Court�s or Judge�s orders
Memoranda of Coram,
appearances, Court�s
orders or directions and
Registrar�s orders.
Mr I. Y. Solkar, for the Petitioner.
Shri S.N. Gawade, A.P.P.,for the State.
Mr S.V.Marwadi i/by Ms Shobha Salvi for Respondent No.4.
Mr Sanjay S. Parab i/by Mulla and Mulla and C.B.C.,for
Respondent Nos. 6 and 7.
CORAM:- D.B. BHOSALE AND A.R. JOSHI, JJ.
DATE :- 8TH APRIL, 2010.
P.C.:-
Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for
withdrawal of this writ petition with liberty to the
petitioner to adopt appropriate remedy against
respondent Nos. 4 to 7. Petition is disposed of as
withdrawn with liberty as prayed. While granting
liberty, we shall not be understood to have expressed
any opinion on the merits of the case.
Petitioner
State
Respondent No.4
Respondent Nos. 6 and 7
D.B. BHOSALE, A.R. JOSHI, JJ.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court