The Bombay High Court dismissed two writ petitions (WP/516/2002 and WP/519/2002) filed against the State as infructuous due to the efflux of time and discharged the rules.
Rule discharged. Interim relief vacated. No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or
directions and Registrar’s Orders.
COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
WP/516/2002 RAJLING V/S STATE WITH WP/519/2002
(SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, J.) (S.B.DESHMUKH, J.) Dt.4.10.2010 akl
Rajling
State
Shrihari P. Davare
S.B. Deshmukh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
