Allowed

Bhagwan Manikrao Chavan and Anr. v. State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Bombay HC1 Oct 2010CA/1439/2010

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court Bench at Aurangabad allowed an application seeking amendment to Writ Petition No. 1411 of 2001, directing the amendment to be effect within two weeks.

What did the court decide?

Application allowed; proposed amendment to be effected within two weeks; amended copy to be placed on record and served on Respondents; writ petition listed for admission after four weeks.

Bhagwan Manikrao Chavan and Anr. Vs State of… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Bombay HC (2010)

¶1

¶2

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD.

¶3

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders.

¶4

Court’s or Judge’s orders.

¶5

CIVIL APPLICATION NO.: 1439 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.: 1411 OF 2001

¶6

***

¶7

1.Heard Mr. Golegaonkar, learned counsel

¶8

for the Applicants, Mr. D.V.Tele, learned
A.G.P. for Respondent Nos.1 and 2, Mr.
H.K.Munde for Respondent No.4 and 6. Shri
U.B.Bondar for Respondent No.3 and 5 absent.

¶9

2.This is an application preferred by the
Applicants for amendment to be carried out in
writ petition NO.1411 of 2001 as stated in
the present application.

¶10

3.For the reasons stated in the
application, we allow the present application
in terms of prayer clause (B). The proposed
amendment to be effected within a period of
two weeks. Amended copy be placed on record
and to be served upon the Respondents within
a period of two weeks.

¶11

4.List writ petition for admission after
four weeks.

¶12

 [SHRIHARI P.DAVARE,J.] [S.B.DESHMUKH, J.]

¶13

Dated:01/10/2010.

¶14

ans/1439

Bhagwan Manikrao Chavan and Anr. v. State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bhagwan Manikrao Chavan and Anr. v. State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shaikh Ibrahim Rafiuddin and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Ansari Sabiya Sultana Momin Mohammad Sameeruddin Vs the State of Maharashtra and Six Ors.

Vijay Hundappa Wani Vs National Seeds Corporation Ltd. and Anr.

Shriram Dnyaneshwar Patil Vs the State of Mah and Ors.

Baban Ramesh Avle Vs the State of Mah and Ors.

Karimabi Badruddin Vs the Registrar Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth Parbhani and Anr.