Bench dismissed writ petition regarding recruitment selection process. Court held no relief could be granted due to non-joinder of necessary parties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 5152 OF 2010
Office Notes, Office Court's or Judge's orders Memoranda of Coram or directions and Registrar's orders. appearances, Court's Orders.
1
Mr. P.S. Dighe, Advocate for the petitioner Mrs. A.V. Gondhalekar, AGP for the respondent No.1 Mr. A.R. Nikam, Advocate for the respondent No.2. Mr U.B. Bondar, Advocate for the respondent No.3.
--CORAM :- B.R. GAVAI & A.A. SAYED, JJ. DATE :- 29TH SEPTEMBER, 2010.
1] The learned counsel for the respondents states that the selection process is complete and the posts are filled up, in the 2nd week of June, 2010.
3] The selection process is complete. In absence of the candidates who have been appointed or atleast some of them being arrayed as party respondents in representative capacity, no relief as claimed can be granted.
2] The writ petition stands dismissed for non-joinder of necessary parties.
grt/-
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 5152 OF 2010
Office Notes, Office Court's or Judge's orders Memoranda of Coram or directions and Registrar's orders. appearances, Court's Orders.
2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether writ relief can be granted in the absence of appointed candidates arrayed as parties.
Petitioner
Respondent No.1
Respondent No.2
Respondent No.3
B.R. Gavai
A.A. Sayed
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
