Criminal Writ Petitions were allowed to be withdrawn by the petitioner, who stated during the pendency of the petitions that he was arrested by the Enforcement Directorate and did not intend to pursue the proceedings further.
Both petitions allowed to be withdrawn as prayed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
44 wp.2376.10 anr
ndm
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2376 OF 2010
Manoj Kumar Babulal Punamiya. ... Petitioner Vs. Rajeshwar Singh and ors. ... Respondent
Mr. S.V.Marwadi i/b Mr. Pankaj Manohar for the Petitioner.
Mr. Mandar Goswami with Mr. Kiran Kandpile for Respondent Nos. 1 & 2. Mr. P.A. Pol, PP for the State.
WITH
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2125 OF 2010
Arvind K. Vyas. ... Petitioner Vs. Rajeshwar Singh and ors. ... Respondent
Mr. S.V.Marwadi i/b V.V.Katti for the Petitioner.
Mr. D.A.Nalawadi, Special PP with Ms. Revati Mohite Dere, APP for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2.
Ms. S.V. Gajare, APP for Respondent No.3/ State.
CORAM : A.M. KHANWILKAR and U.D. SALVI, JJ. DATE : 25th August, 2010.
P.C.
The learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that during the
2
44 wp.2376.10 anr
pendency of these petitions, the Petitioner has been arrested by Enforcement of Directorate. In the circumstances, he does not intend to pursue the present petitions. Accordingly, both petitions are allowed to be withdrawn as prayed.
[ U.D. SALVI, J ] [ A.M. KHANWILKAR, J ]
Manoj Kumar Babulal Punamiya
Arvind K. Vyas
Rajeshwar Singh
A.M. KHANWILKAR
U.D. SALVI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
