Writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn by the court on the basis of communications received from the petitioners and submissions by counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders.
Court’s or Judge’s orders.
WRIT PETITION NO.: 3454 OF 2008
***
1.We have heard learned counsel Mr. S.V.
Gondare holding for Mr. V.D.Gunale who
appears for the Petitioners, Mr. V. B.
Ghatge, learned A.G.P. for Respondent No.1,
learned A.G.Patil, Advocate holding for Mr.
A. D. Shinde for Respondent No.2, learned
counsel Mr. Jadhavar for Respondent No.5.
2.Mr. Gundare tenders communications
received by him from the petitioners. They
are marked by letter "X" collectively and
taken on record. In view of these
communications and submissions made by
counsel for the Petitioners, on the basis of
the said communications, writ petition stands
dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
[SHRIHARI P.DAVARE,J.] [S.B.DESHMUKH, J.]
Dated:07/10/2010.
ans/3454
SHRIHARI P.DAVARE
S.B.DESHMUKH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court