Petitioner sought to withdraw a writ petition regarding pending execution of an award; the High Court allowed the withdrawal and dismissed the petition without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.3279 OF 2010
Laxman s/o Kashinath Deshmukh
..PETITIONER
VERSUS
The State of Mah. & ors.
..RESPONDENTS
Mr D.R. Jayabhar, Advocate for the petitioner; Mr S.K. Kadam, A.G.P. for respondent - State.
CORAM : P.V. HARDAS AND S.V. GANGAPURWALA, JJ
DATE : 20th April, 2010
PER COURT :
Mr Jayabhar, learned Counsel for the petitioner states on instructions that as the execution filed by the petitioner in respect of execution of award is pending before the Executing Court, the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this petition. Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
( S.V. GANGAPURWALA ) ( P.V.HARDAS ) JUDGE JUDGE
amj/wp3279.10
Laxman s/o Kashinath Deshmukh
The State of Mah.
P.V. Hardas
S.V. Gangapurwala
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court