Satish Khandu Gaikwad v. Subhash Vidya Mandir and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
WP disposed as infructuous after respondent no. 3 withdrew the impugned order. Associated CA also disposed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 WP No.3020/10
mpt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.3020 of 2010
Mr.Satish Khandu Gaikwad ... Petitioner versus Subhash Vidya Mandir & ors. ... Respondents
Mr. Uday P. Warunjikar for the petitioner. Ms.S.S.Bhende AGP for respondent nos.3 and 4. Mr.Abhay Ostwal for intervenor in Civil Application no.1504 of 2010
CORAM : D.K. DESHMUKH AND
N.D.DESHPANDE, JJ
DATED : 4th October 2010
P.C.
(D.K.DESHMUKH, J)
(N.D.DESHPANDE,J)
Mr. Satish Khandu Gaikwad
Subhash Vidya Mandir
D.K. DESHMUKH
N.D. DESHPANDE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court