The High Court disposed of a writ petition complaining of inaction by the Magistrate in considering an application under Section 340 and 195 CrPC. The Court directed the Magistrate to decide the application within two weeks.
Direction to Respondent No. 3 to consider the application under Section 340 r/w 195 CrPC within two weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp.2614.10.sxw
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2614 OF 2010
Shivaji Hindurao Patil Versus State of Maharashtra & Ors.
...Petitioner
...Respondents
Mr.S.S.Patwardhan for Petitioner.
Mr.K.V.Saste, A.P.P. for State.
CORAM:- A.M.KHANWILKAR AND U.D.SALVI, JJ. DATED:- SEPTEMBER 15, 2010.
P.C.
wp.2614.10.sxw
2
than 11th October 2010 and inform the decision taken thereon to the
Petitioner within such time. All questions are left open.
(U.D.SALVI, J.)
(A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.)
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court should direct the Magistrate to consider the Section 340 r/w Section 195 CrPC application filed by the petitioner.
What time limit should be imposed for the consideration of the application for filing of report under Section 200 of the CrPC.
Shivaji Hindurao Patil
State of Maharashtra
U.D.Salvi
A.M.Khanwilkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
