District Judge on 10th August, 2010. The R & P was received by Mr.Joshi on 30th August, 2010. However, he did not immediately forward the R & P to this Court on the specious ground that he had no information as to the next date of hearing of the matter before this Court. That explanation in our opinion is unacceptable. Inasmuch as, once R & P writ has been received from this Court, the Superintendent-District Court was obliged to take action to forward the R & P with immediate despatch. The fact that R & P was received by him from District Judge on 30th August, 2010 is admitted by Mr. Joshi. Further, the fact that he was not aware of the next date of hearing before the Court does not take the matter any further. Irrespective of whether the matter was to be proceeded before this Court, he was expected to forward the R & P immediately on his own. Indeed, the fact that the matter was listed on 8th September, 2010 was informed to Mr. Joshi on telephone only on 8th September, 2010 and he could not, therefore, arrange to send R & P immediately on 8th September, 2010. However, there has been inaction on the part of Mr. Joshi between 30th August, 2010 till 8th September, 2010. In view of the above, we make it clear that said Mr. D.Y. Joshi-Assistant Superintendent will not be entitled for TA & DA expenses incurred by him for attending this Court proceedings today. We leave the matter at that.
