The High Court of Bombay disposed of Writ Petition No. 2379 of 2010 by upholding consent terms between the parties without bringing up any disputes or objections.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp2379.10.sxw
1
ssm
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2379 OF 2010
The General Manager, Brihanmumbai Electric Supply & Transport Undertaking ....Petitioner. Vs.
Shri Shivaji Annarao Patil ....Respondent.
Ms. Kavita Anchar for the Petitioner. Mr. R.D. Bhat for the Respondent.
CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.
DATE : 16th December, 2010
P.C.:
The parties have arrived at settlement and accordingly singed
the consent terms. The same is taken on record. It is countersigned by
the respective advocates. There is no dispute/ objection with regard to the authenticity, identity and or signature of the parties. The statement is also made that the consent terms are within the framework of law and the record.
2 The Petition is accordingly disposed of in view of consent terms, with liberty.
(ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)
The General Manager, Brihanmumbai Electric Supply & Transport Undertaking
Shri Shivaji Annarao Patil
Anoop V. Mohta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
