The court disposed of an arbitration petition as the parties had settled the matter out of court.
Disposal of arbitration petition as settled; vacation of interim order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
arbpl1741.09.sxw
1
ssm
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ARBITRATION PETITION (LODGING) NO. 1741 OF 2009
Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd.
....Petitioner.
Vs.
Sanjeev Chaman Obhan & Anr.
....Respondents.
Mr. Rahul Mehta i/by Ms. Disha Karambar for the Petitioner. Mr. Rajeev Tripathi for the Respondents.
CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.
DATE : 9th December, 2010
P.C.:
The learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner makes
statement that the parties have settled the matter out of the Court. In view of this, the matter is disposed of as not pressed. Interim order,
already granted, stand vacated accordingly. No costs.
(ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)
Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd.
Sanjeev Chaman Obhan & Anr.
Anoop V. Mohta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
