The petitioner sought withdrawal of the writ petition following a communication stating the pending appeal had been decided. The High Court dismissed the writ petition accordingly.
Permitting withdrawal of the writ petition and dismissing it.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.2118 OF 2010
Sharif Khan Ismail Khan Pathan .. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and ors.
..Respondents
Mr.N.D.Sonwane, Advocate for petitioner Mr.S.V.Kurundkar, Additional Govt.Pleader for respondent No.1 Mr.S.P.Shah, Advocate for respondent No.2
CORAM : P.V.HARDAS AND S.V.GANGAPURWALA, JJ.
DATE : 28th April 2010
PER COURT :
( S.V.GANGAPURWALA, J.)
( P.V.HARDAS, J.)
(vvr/2118.10wp)
2
Sharif Khan Ismail Khan Pathan
The State of Maharashtra
P.V. Hardas
S.V. Gangapurwala
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
