The petition challenging termination of service became infructuous when the disciplinary authority withdrew the order, agreed to reinstate the petitioner, pay back-wages, and consequential benefits.
Petition disposed of as infructuous; no specific relief granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORIGINAL SIDE
WRIT PETITION NO.1959 OF 2009
Vivek Gajanan Kulkarni.... Petitioner
Vs.
Brihan Mumbai Municipal
Corporation.... Respondent
Ms M.H. Doshi i/b Shri D.H. Nandu for
the Petitioner.
Ms Kavita Anchan i/b M.V. Kini & Co.
for the Respondent.
CORAM: J.N. PATEL AND
A.P. BHANGALE, JJ.
DATED: APRIL 22, 2010
P.C:
The learned counsel appearing for the
respondent,oninstructionsfromthe
disciplinary authority, makes a statement that
the disciplinary authority is withdrawing the
impugned order terminating the services of the
petitioner and would reinstate the petitioner
forthwith and pay all his back-wages along with
the consequential benefits on or before
30-6-2010. The statement is accepted. In view
of the aforestated statement, the petition has
become infructuous and is disposed of as such.
J.N. PATEL, J.
Vivek Gajanan Kulkarni
Brihan Mumbai Municipal Corporation
J.N. PATEL
A.P. BHANGALE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court