Petitioner withdrew the criminal writ petition to file a formal complaint with the Anti Corruption Bureau, Satara Unit, thereby resolving the matter.
Petitioner granted liberty to withdraw the petition to file a formal complaint with the Anti Corruption Bureau, Satara Unit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp1935.10
1
ast
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1935 OF 2010
Mahadev T. Kambale. ....Petitioner Vs. State of Maharashtra & ors. ....Respondents
Mr.Amit Sale with Sandeep Babar for petitioner.
Mr. A.S.Gadkari, APP for State.
CORAM:- A.M.KHANWILKAR AND U.D.SALVI, JJ
DATED:- AUGUST 30, 2010
P.C.
wp1935.10
that the Petitioner can make formal complaint to the Anti Corruption Bureau,
who in turn will be obliged to take necessary action in accordance with law. Petition disposed of accordingly.
(U.D.SALVI, J)
(A.M.KHANWILKAR, J)
Mahadev T. Kambale
State of Maharashtra
A.M. Khanwilkar
U.D. Salvi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
