Dismissed
Ahimsa v. State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Bombay HCWP/1897/1997
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY…
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
¶2
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
¶3
WRIT PETITION NO. 1897 OF 1997
¶4
AHIMSA .. .. PETITIONERS
¶5
Vs.
¶6
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA& ORS...
¶7
.. RESPONDENTS
¶8
Ms. M. Kejale, AGP
¶9
CORAM: SMT. RANJANA DESAI & R. V. MORE, JJ.
¶10
DATED : 14/9/2010
¶11
P.C.
¶12
On 8/9/10 counsel for the petitioner was not present, hence we adjourned the petition to 14/9/2010. We directed that the petition be placed under the caption ‘For Dismissal’. Today again petitioner’s counsel is not present. The petition is, therefore, dismissed for want of prosecution.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
AHIMSA
- respondent
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS
Coram
AI extract
RANJANA DESAI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Ramkutir Co-Operative Housing Society Ltd. and Anr. Vs Bombay Municipal Corporation and 13 Ors.
Jayram a. Shetty and Anr. Vs the Commissioner, Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and 9 Ors.
The Greater Bombay Veershaiv C. H. Socity Ltd. and Anr. Vs the Brihanmumbai Mahanagarpalika and 10 Ors.
Sachin Pawankumar Lath Vs the State of Maharashtra and 4 Ors.