Dismissed
Jayram a. Shetty and Anr. v. the Commissioner, Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and 9 Ors.
Bombay HCWP/1347/2010
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
THE HIGH COURT
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-: 1 :-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
srp
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 1347 OF 2010.
Jayram A. Shetty & Anr. ..Petitioners. Versus
The Commissioner, Municipal Corp. of Gr. Mumbai & Others.
..Respondents.
Mr. Vatsal Shah i/b Naik Paranjpe & Co., for the petitioners. Ms. Shobha Ajitkumar for BMC.
Mr. A. B.Ketkar, AGP for respondent nos. 3 to 7.
Coram : SMT. RANJANA DESAI & R. V. MORE, JJ. Date : September 13, 2010.
P. C. :
settled their dispute and they wish to tender consent terms in this Court. Consent terms duly signed by the 1st petitioner for himself and on behalf of the 2nd petitioner as its secretary and respondent nos.8, 9 & 10 are taken on
record and marked “X”. We record the presence of the 1st petitioner and respondent nos. 8, 9 & 10 in our Court today. The 1st petitioner and respondent nos. 8, 9 & 10 confirm that the dispute is amicably settled.
Hence, order in terms of the consent terms. Undertaking given in consent
terms is accepted by this Court. The petition is disposed of in terms of the
consent terms.
(R.V. More, J.) (Smt. Ranjana Desai,J.)
Jayram A. Shetty
The Commissioner, Municipal Corp. of Gr. Mumbai
RANJANA DESAI
R. V. MORE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court