Dismissed

Dr. Abhishek Pareek and Anr. v. State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Bombay HC7 Jul 2010WP/1630/2010

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Group writ petitions regarding eligibility criteria for super-speciality course admissions were withdrawn by petitioners following a government assurance that rules would remain unchanged. The court granted leave to withdraw and dismissed the petitions and related summons.

What did the court decide?

leave granted to withdraw petitions; petitions dismissed; chamber summons dismissed.

Dr. Abhishek Pareek and Anr. Vs State of Maharashtra… — Education and Admissions | Bombay HC (2010)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION LOD.NO.1334 OF 2010

¶3

Dr.Abhishek Pareek S/o.Ramesh Chandra Pareek and Anr. .. Petitioners Versus State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents

¶4

WITH

¶5

WRIT PETITION LOD.NO.1308 OF 2010

¶6

Dr.Khan Niaz and Ors. .. Petitioners Versus State of Maharashtra & Anr. .. Respondents

¶7

WITH

¶8

WRIT PETITION LOD.NO.1546 OF 2010

¶9

Dr.Piyush Pratapsingh & Anr. .. Petitioners Versus State of Maharashtra & Anr. .. Respondents

¶10

WITH

¶11

WRIT PETITION LOD.NO.1471 OF 2010

¶12

Dr.Manish Saxena & Ors. .. Petitioners Versus The Competent Authority & Director and Anr. .. Respondents

¶13

WITH

¶14

¶15

WRIT PETITION LOD.NO.1542 OF 2010

¶16

Dr.Rakhil Yadav and Ors. Versus

¶17

.. Petitioners

¶18

The Competent Authority & Directorate & Anr. .. Respondents

¶19

WITH

¶20

WRIT PETITION NO.1123 OF 2010

¶21

Dr.Buddhi Prakash Sharma and Ors. .. Petitioners Versus

¶22

State of Maharashtra & Anr. .. Respondents

¶23

Mr.Pramod Patil i/b. Sunita D. Sonawane for petitioners in W.P.(L) 1334 and 1123 of 2010.

¶24

Mr.V.M.Thorat for petitioners in W.P.LOD.1308 and 1546 of 2010. Mr.Vilas Jadhav for petitioners in W.P.LOD1471 OF 2010. Ms.Geeta Shastri AGP for State.

¶25

Mr.Shailesh C. Naidu i/b. Uttangale & Co. for applicants in C/s.203/10 Mr.Ranvir Shekhawat for applicant in C/s.195 of 2010.

¶26

CORAM : MOHIT S. SHAH, C.J. & S.C.Dharmadhikari, J. Date : 7^th July 2010.

¶27

P.C.

¶28

1] Learned Counsel for the State places on record the letter dated 7^th

¶29

July 2010 from the Joint Secretary, Government of Maharashtra, Medical

¶30

¶31

Education and Drugs Department addressed to the Director, Medical Education and Research indicating that the eligibility criteria for admission to the super-speciality course for academic year 2010-2011

¶32

will remain the same as per the Rules prescribed for last year i.e. 2009 – 2010. The said communication is taken on record and marked “X” for identification.

¶33

2] In view of the above stand of the State Government, learned Counsel for petitioners seek leave to withdraw the respective petitions. Leave granted. Petitions are allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such.

¶34

3] Chamber summons No.203 and 195 of 2010 do not survive in the

¶35

light of withdrawal of the petitions and are dismissed as such.

¶36

(CHIEF JUSTICE)

¶37

(S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J)

Dr. Abhishek Pareek and Anr. v. State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dr. Abhishek Pareek and Anr. v. State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vishwanath D Borkar Vs the State of Maharashtra and 5 Ors.

Taranath Sunder Shetty Vs the Commissioner of Municipal Corporation of Gr. Mumbai and 7 Ors.

Girreddy Suryanarayan Reddy Vs Chief Commissioner for Persons With Disabilities and 9 Ors.

Sarika W/O. Ajay Patil Vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Rajendar Damodar Sawant and 14 Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtr and 7 Ors.

M/S. P.M. Shah and Co. and Anr. Vs Union of India and 5 Ors.