The petition was dismissed for want of prosecution as the learned counsel stated having no instructions from the clients, who failed to respond despite intimations.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORIGINAL SIDE
WRIT PETITION NO.1509 OF 1996
R.K. Nishankar & Ors..... Petitioners
Vs.
National Bank for Agriculture
and Rural Development.... Respondents
S/Shri Ajeet Manwani i/b G.K. Masand
for the Petitioners.
None for the Respondents.
DATED: MARCH 29, 2010
P.C:
The learned counsel appearing on behalf
of the petitioners states that he has no
instructions in the matter. It is further
submitted that though intimations are given,
there is no response from his clients. The
petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
R.K. Nishankar & Ors
National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court