The writ petition was withdrawn by the learned counsel for the petitioners. The court permitted the withdrawal and dismissed the petition as withdrawn. No substantive legal proposition is laid down.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 1459 OF 2009
Ispat Industries Ltd., & Anr. .... Petitioners. vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..... Respondents.
Mr. Dr. B.B. Saraf i/by M/s. K. Ashar & Co. for the petitioners.
Mr. D.A. Nalawade, G.P. for the respondent State.
Ms. S.V. Bharucha for respondent no. 3.
CORAM : J.N. PATEL, ACTING, C.J. &
B.R. GAVAI, J.
DATE : 11TH JANUARY, 2010.
P.C.
The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he may be
permitted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to seek alternative remedy. Permitted to withdraw. Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
(J.N. PATEL, ACTING, C.J.)
Ispat Industries Ltd.
The State of Maharashtra
J.N. PATEL
B.R. GAVAI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
