Counsel for the petitioner indicated that prayer clause (b) is the only prayer being pressed. The Appropriate Plea Privilege Adviser stated there is no interference in the investigation. The petition was disposed of as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
L
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION No. 1024/2010
Office Notes, Office Memoranda Court’s or Judge’s orders of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders.
Mr K.S.Patil i/b Deepak Shinde for the Petitioner. Mrs A.S.Pai, A.P.P.,for the State.
CORAM:- D.B. BHOSALE AND A.R. JOSHI, JJ.
DATE :- 1ST APRIL, 2010.
P.C.:-
other person in carrying out the investigation in respect of the offences registered by them against the petitioner. In view thereof, Mr Patil does not press this writ petition. Petition is disposed of as not pressed.
(A.R.JOSHI,J) (D.B. BHOSALE,J)
Petitioner
State represented by A.P.P.
D.B. BHOSALE
A.R. JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
