The petitioner sought to withdraw the writ petition after placing a Memorandum of Understanding on record. The High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn; Notice of motion disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
hvn
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICUATURE AT MUMBAI ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL SIDE
WRIT PETITION NO. 1954 OF 2003 WITH
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 80 OF 2007
Mahendra Tribhovandas Shah ... Petitioner Versus B.M.C. & Ors. ... Respondents
Mr. Bipin Joshi for Petitioner.
Mr.Pranjal Dave for R. No. 6(A) and (B).
Mr. Sachin Nerkar for R. No. 6(C) and (D).
CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & J.H. BHATIA, JJ. DATED : FEBRUARY 25, 2010
P.C.
Petitioner places on record Memorandum of Understanding entered into into between the Petitioner and Smt. Rina J. Shah, Bijal M. Shah, Jitendra R. Jain, Jinendra R. Jain. The same is taken on record. In view of the same, the learned counsel seeks leave to withdraw the petition. Petition dismissed as withdrawn. Rule discharged. No order as to costs.
In view of the dismissal of the petition, motion becomes infructuous and hence, disposed of as infructuous.
(J.H. BHATIA,J.)
(F.I. REBELLO,J.)
Mahendra Tribhovandas Shah
B.M.C. & Ors.
F.I. Rebello
J.H. Bhatia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
