This single-judge division bench allowed the Notice of Motion and set aside a specific order, restoring the writ petition to the file for future hearing without addressing substantive legal principles.
Notice of motion allowed; order dated 15-11-2010 set aside; writ petition restored to file.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NMW 661 of 2010
ssp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.661 OF 2010
IN
WRIT PETITION NO.1910 of 2005
Yeshwant Surve .....Petitioner versus The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and Ors. ..... Respondents
..... Respondents
Ms.Anjali Purav, for the petitioner.
Ms.Shobha Ajeet Kumar, for the respondent-Corporation.
CORAM: P.B.MAJMUDAR&
MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ.
DATE: 20th DECEMBER,2010.
P.C. :
( MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J. )
( P.B.MAJMUDAR, J. )
Yeshwant Surve
The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai
P.B.Majmudar
Mrs. Mridula Bhatkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
