Three writ petitions concerning pensions were restored to the board after notices of motion for status were allowed, disposing of the notices accordingly.
The wrt petitions are restored to the board and the notices of motion are disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORIGINAL SIDE
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.204 OF 2010
IN
WRIT PETITION NO.677 OF 1997
Capt. Kaushik Virendra Patel.... Petitioner
Vs.
Indian Airlines Limited
& Anr..... Respondents
WITH
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.202 OF 2010
IN
WRIT PETITION NO.2971 OF 2001
Capt. Jayprakash Vithal
Gadgil.... Petitioner
Vs.
Indian Airlines Limited
& Anr..... Respondents
AND
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.203 OF 2010
IN
WRIT PETITION NO.2972 OF 2001
Capt. Pankaj Mehta.... Petitioner
Vs.
Indian Airlines Limited
& Anr..... Respondents
Ms Naina Dutia i/b M/s. Nameet & Co.
for the Petitioner.
S/Shri S.M. Dixit i/b Abhay Kulkarni
for the Respondents.
CORAM: J.N. PATEL AND
A.P. BHANGALE, JJ.
DATED: APRIL 22, 2010
P.C:
Heard. Considering the facts disclosed
in the affidavits in support of the notices of
motion, the same are allowed and the writ
petitions are restored to the board. The writ
petitions to be listed accordingly on the
weekly board. The notices of motion stand
disposed of.
J.N. PATEL, J.
A.P. BHANGALE, J.
Capt. Kaushik Virendra Patel
Capt. Jayprakash Vithal Gadgil
Capt. Pankaj Mehta
Indian Airlines Limited
J.N. PATEL
A.P. BHANGALE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court