This court disposed of a motion seeking a stay of an injunction order operating for six months, dismissing the motion as no case was made out for interference based on the learned court's findings.
Motion seeking stay of injunction order was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 720 OF 2010
IN
APPEAL NO. 134 OF 2010
IN
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1566 OF 2009 WITH
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2642 OF 2007
IN
SUIT NO. 1956 OF 2007
Best Media Associates (India) Pvt. Ltd. ...Appellants
Versus
Reed Elsevier Properties Inc. & Anr. ...Respondents
Mr. Rahul Chitnis with Ms. Hate i/by M/s. Gajaria & Co. for the Appellants
Dr. Veerendra V. Tulzapurkar, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Ashish Kamat and Ms. Bindya Raichura i/by M/s. Mulla & Mulla & Craigie Blunt & Caroe for the Respondents.
CORAM: F.I. REBELLO AND R.V. MORE, JJ. DATE : JUNE 16, 2010
P.C. :-
Injunction is operating against the appellants since
January 2010. The appellants seek stay of the order of
2
the learned Court. However, considering the finding recorded by the learned Court, and the fact that the injunction is operating for the last 6 months, no case is made out for interference. Hence, Motion is dismissed.
( F.I. REBELLO, J.)
(R.V. MORE, J.)
Best Media Associates (India) Pvt. Ltd.
Reed Elsevier Properties Inc.
Anr.
F.I. Rebello
R.V. More
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
